|
ESSAYS
& EVENTS
Making a New Play Out
of Old Pieces
By Jack Marshall
After decades, indeed centuries, of
conclusive evidence to the contrary, many play-goers persist in
believing that all a director does is tell actors where to move,
just as many believe that an actor's greatest challenge is memorizing
lines. Undoubtedly, there are some directors, even some
well-known and critically acclaimed ones, who don't do much more
than direct traffic, and there are definitely professional actors
who can't learn lines. But Drama Under the Influence, the
latest addition to The American Century Theater's "Reflections"
series, demonstrates the stage director's creative and substantive
role in communicating ideas, subtext, historical commentary and
emotions that would not register on the audience without his efforts.
When a director does this, and good directors to it often and well,
it is an act of creation that uses the original work (or in the
case of this play, works) as a springboard to a new and
original artistic statement.
Drama Under the
Influence is a collection of seven short plays by six female
playwrights who were active in the 1920s. Director Mazzola had long
been interested in exploring the essentially forgotten works of
early 20th Century women writers as a source of enlightenment
on their times as well as a trove of still engaging plays that never
had a fair chance to succeed commercially. With valuable suggestions
and assistance from historian Deborah Martinson, he found many suitable
plays from the period. A typical director would have just chosen
the "best" that could fill out an evening, arranged them to maximize
set change efficiency and casting economy, and put them on the stage,
each standing on its own with little relationship to the others.
Most one-act evenings, sad to say,
are constructed exactly like that, with a unifying theme or title
("the short plays of Tennessee Williams"; one-act comedies; stage
adaptations of short stories) and nothing more, creating the dramatic
equivalent of a musical variety show. Such shows are diverting but
somehow unsatisfying, like a buffet dinner in which one's plate
includes Beef Wellington, garlic scampi and Waldorf salad.
Mazzola, however, took the necessary
next step, beginning the inherently scary process in which the director
must not only become an artist, but must take on the responsibility
of shaping another artist's creation, a creation that was a personal
statement, made in her unique voice, of inspirations generated in
her brain. If the director destroys the essence of that creation,
he buries the last living spark from a remarkable mind that exists
no more. If he has integrity and respect for the artist, he must
find a way to preserve her message while employing it in his own.
This is a test of skill as well as character. Many directors think
nothing of warping and distorting a playwright's work to fit their
own agendas. Think of all the feminist versions of The Taming
of the Shrew, complete with newly written endings, Peter Sellars'
King Lear as a mundane modern dress play about the homeless
problem, and The Importance of Being Ernest with an all-male
casts. No matter how clever or well-executed such exercises are,
they are examples of the original material serving the director
rather than the other way around.
Drama Under the Influence
is something very different. The plays themselves are not altered
at all; each playwright would recognize hers and find it free of
interpretations and characterizations that undermined its original
intent. The plays do, however, reinforce each other, and form a
collage telling us much more about what it meant to be a woman during
the Prohibition years than any one of the plays could. We see courageous
women, desperate women, mad women, angry women, women who feel sisterhood
with one another and women who have a sense of humor. Launched into
our evening's journey by Sophie Treadwell's expressionistic dissection
of the disparate and incomplete roles society forces women to play---daughter,
lover, sex object, wife---we see the fault lines and stresses of
a gender in crisis and flux, paraded before us in distinct styles
and attitudes using a remarkable emotional palette that no one playwright
could bring to the stage. Tying it together further are the design
elements: the set, the lights, and especially the music, matching
and contrasting feelings, smoothing transitions, intensifying atmosphere.
The result is one play, not seven,
and yet seven too. The combined work has a different feel and message
than any of its parts, and yet it is consistent with all of them.
They are made stronger by their association with each other. Drama
Under the Influence is a new play, fashioned by the director
from old pieces abandoned in the American theater's attic. And it
is a powerful example of the responsible way a skilled director
can make his own voice heard in harmony with the voices of great
artists of the past.
Author's Note: Director Mazzola
did not have any notice that this article was being written for
the Audience Guide. If he had, he almost certainly would have asked
that it not be included. But I feel that it is critical for our
audiences to appreciate the origins of this play and his extraordinary
role in bringing it to our stage, and so, while extending him my
apologies, the article remains. JM.
~ Originally published in 2007 in
the Audience
Guide for TACT's production of Drama Under the Influence.
|